This is a chapter excerpt from the book, X Rubicon, Lies And Damned Lies. Women are used to entice men to enlist. One manipulation among many? But women are also being manipulated by government propaganda and feminist propaganda. Women don’t do well with combat (no matter what diary or old letter, myth, or propaganda you may have read, or propaganda picture you may have seen - ie, the woman in makeup with a helmet on, hair down, holding rocket launchers and automatic weapons with shouldered bandalaros; though they are extremely brave in other ways); on the other hand, women have proven themselves throughout history extremely capable of pushing for wars, starting wars, and ordering wholesale death. Women in combat means only one thing: more women dying and more than men. If you insist that women are capable of combat, you have no idea what combat is.
Women as well suck up the false narratives. If you follow TV and movie trends, you’ll see the completely false narrative that women have been involved in combat and special operations since 9/11, wielding knives, automatic weapons, and krav maga all over the Middle East for decades. The media, from news to entertainment, enable and perpetuate these falsehoods. The truth of the matter is that no established force utilizes women in the field for close or front line combat (including the Israelis) – and this has nothing to do with chauvinism, and a lot to do with the fact that women just don’t want to involve themselves in war until they’ve been programmed to want it – and yet, they still suck at it. Women in rebel forces often participate in front line combat, but that’s more due to a desperate need than a want or skill – they still suck at it. Women have been allowed to become Navy SEALS since 2016, yet no woman participates in that front line combat. In Afghanistan, the US Army attempted an all woman unit (trained to a lower standard than men because they couldn’t carry the weight nor meet the physical requirements) searching for weapons and conducting house to house searches. The experiment had to be terminated early because they were firing at each other and shooting friendlies, because they were operating in panic mode. The fact is the overwhelming majority of women choose not to participate in direct proportion to the amount of combat going on at the time (Judith Stiehm, Arms and the Enlisted Woman, Philadelphia, Temple University Press, 1989, p100; Newsweek, 5.8.991; and Laura Miller, “Feminism and the Exclusion of Army Women from Combat”, Harvard University, John M Olin Institute for Strategic Studies, 1997-8, p19; all in The Privileged Sex by Martin van Creveld). Why is this relevant? Because it has been said that “war is a man’s thing” (I had a woman therapist say this to me), and war represents “toxic masculinity”. Because women are susceptible to the same lies fed to men regarding glory in war, of which there is none. In an insidious twist, many of the lies specifically fed to women don’t come from the military, or from men, but from other women – feminists, Karens (who may threaten to throat punch you), and heartless revenge seekers. NOW wants women to be drafted, yet not a single woman of NOW has ever faced combat, close or far away, nor will they ever. They are a privileged class of women, like virgins talking about sex, trying to steal more privilege and power at the expense of lower class women who will pay for it supremely. Women’s groups pushed to continue war in Afghanistan, for the purpose of “saving” Afghan women. Though never having to face combat or put their own lives on the line, they’ve decided that they are willing to sacrifice the lives of any amount of men and civilians to achieve their political and/or social power goals – and not by asking, but by lobbying the halls of power to force the involvement of men. “The road to women’s privilege is paved with the corpses of men… In regard to the way they are raised, the work they do, the economic support they receive, and their position vis-a-vis the law, women have always enjoyed and still enjoy considerable privileges. Likewise, when it comes to fulfilling their obligation to society, women have enjoyed and still enjoy considerable privileges. The greatest single privilege is that they are hardly ever expected to shed blood for their people.” (In the Maw of Mars: The Principle of the Thing, The Privileged Sex by Martin van Creveld, 2013, DVLC Enterprises).
Then there are the revenge seekers like Madeline Albright, ready and willing to sacrifice any amount of men and civilians (“500,000”+) in order to “free” Bosnia and fuck the Russian menace. There was Margaret Thatcher, ready and willing to sacrifice any amount of men and civilians to force a country to give back its own island. There was Golda Meir, ready and willing to sacrifice any amount of Palestinian men, women, and children via genocide and expulsion to the greater glory of the return of the Israeli kingdom (stolen from the inhabitants now and centuries ago). Recently, there are Marjorie Taylor Greene, Ginnie Thomas (yes, the Supreme Court justice’s wife), Lauren Boebert, Marine La Pen, and Trumpettes – psychobitches from Donald Trump’s harem of loony women, ready and willing to start Civil War. War and its causes truly know no boundaries of sex. Ignorance, greed, and the lust for power abounds in men and women. So no, war is not a “man’s thing”.
**********
Read Alan MacLeod’s article here.
https://www.mintpressnews.com/simp-to-soldier-e-girls-military-recuitment-gen-z/284897/
I chose not to read Alan MacLeod's article, not only out of laziness but because I always knew that globally women (and children) suffer more than adult men in wartime. Just to verify what I always knew to be the case I looked it up.
I fervently hope that my country never suffers another war on its soil but in the world we are entering I don't think that's guaranteed. War isn't just watching bombs fall on television.
https://press.un.org/en/2003/sc7908.doc.htm